From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 22 1: 4:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from skaarup.org (skaarup.org [130.228.230.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560ED37C0CE for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 01:04:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rasmus@gal.dk) Received: from localhost (skaarup@localhost) by skaarup.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA04679 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:04:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rasmus@gal.dk) Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 10:04:12 +0100 (CET) From: Rasmus Skaarup X-Sender: skaarup@skaarup.org To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: New names for installation floppies (Was: Re: 4.0-RELEASE boot.flp fails to boot on K6/2) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >Jordan K. Hubbard said: > >> Good idea, terrible name. Can't you guys some up with something better? > >kern.flp -> start.flp ====>>> boot.flp > >mfsroot.flp -> install.flp ====>>> initsys.flp > > > >boot.flp -> bigstart.flp ====>>> bootinit.flp > > bigdisk.flp ? I think it is a very bad idea to name kern.flp the same as the old 2.88 image. This would cause confusion. And I think the name of the 2.88 image should reflect the large size of the image. > >> > Great idea. Would you be able to make the changes locally and test a > >> > `make release'? Then all we need to do is pass the patch pass JKH. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > And I > thought this was the objectionable phrase It was. But then Jordan initiated a hunt-down-a-better-name-for-the-2.88- installation-disk chase. Best regards Rasmus Skaarup To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message