From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 01:12:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B06FEEB for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 01:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2877F623 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 01:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 756355F2358B; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:12:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 17:12:32 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: switching from ports to pkg -- mailman group mismatch Message-ID: <20141205011232.GC11940@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20141204214125.33860.qmail@ary.lan> <5480EC4B.5010803@bluerosetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5480EC4B.5010803@bluerosetech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: John Levine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 01:12:33 -0000 --0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:20:43PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > On 12/4/2014 1:41 PM, John Levine wrote: > >> Second, I now find myself in a situation where some software must be > >> installed with pkg and some must be installed from ports. If it's just > >> mailman, that's one thing. If it becomes a bunch of packages, I have a > >> real mess on my hands. > > > > Yes, we have a mess. If you need a port compiled with other than the > > standard options, you can't use the package, and it's a challenge > > to keep pkg from stomping your locally compiled versions. >=20 > What issue are you seeing? I think he means the 'pkg' version where he wrote 'package' above. The pkg versions are obviously built with one set of options, that hopefully get along with each other. ;-) --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUgQaAAAoJEBV64x4SNmArJ/EQAL9l4cyZk2kZTclwB6w+8OJr ynJWQtXKuoeuVcl8NgbuJqqruDzo7mpIm42Z+ChLTPgTpMRi13miPihC2qkZGXu5 h40imv0E9rNjU8NSLKETnAbv+14EjIaf7brE8usOdPCjkZEm1edDoyqoYA1ck7l7 1FZe8JQWJ/ZSSiF5LwxDBAp0nK7IpDud5w6iufP9vBiU7nik6Bf2p2LvVNCx7Xt6 QRI2DE33eAF9ZWZt+NKNVjyUOty/qytbq7MpmCa+ie6L0reRj1MItIRhg6/WIpgi ptKS42iOPlHo3Fc+nAiQAQHdPQ4SX7BMcVrrPvsEEU5Te8bOKeLYHZkm0MprGHuu MBX/s8Bnq53hm8g5K44GcGe7RmFfelty/R0NaHLZkqdRc1MrWgjB94silubZ8uol jWYdzS0FCAc6K6QwfEg9b3DynEVZI7QwO0Yfv/pshF5poBxeuxdm/atMfcZlQwzz JD8vWXBaJRqUXsfAVKA+pO05N+hDR52rma3p72b5rKHOQ/90cmTbYYW/D4Yp+i/9 TpKlOgFhG4YLOK9i8bF5p7Xqimfjg5m6NgPRjZSFzcc5qOHrd5vSbW1koS8ryKiv DjJ2hGN0gB05iLyQ5iRZfrjbkLBluUA0oTxv4vCQc9ADymjyMPHTJjriaJKWYmlC VIHSlg/ULqGAqKXQwG0D =lz0n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0vzXIDBeUiKkjNJl--