Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:26:08 -0800 From: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah) To: Arun Sharma <arun@sharma-home.net> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: verbose device probing ? Message-ID: <200301211626.h0LGQ88B001307@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20030121051713.GA12845@sharma-home.net> References: <20030120065614.GA4212@sharma-home.net> <200301201633.h0KGX9B9087836@intruder.bmah.org> <20030121051713.GA12845@sharma-home.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_2074436656P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Arun Sharma wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:33:09AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > > PS. I personally ignore the severity and priority fields of PRs. The > > importance of many PRs I've dealt with is very much inflated. > > > > Perhaps you should change the severity field to a lower level then ? Or > is there a different problem (such as lack of good tools) that prevent you > from doing that ? The severity and priority fields can be changed manually but that doesn't solve the problem that relying on the user-specified severity and priority fields for anything meaningful just doesn't work. The only point that I was trying to make with my comment was that you shouldn't place much weight on the contents of the severity and priority fields in the database. Bruce. --==_Exmh_2074436656P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE+LXSg2MoxcVugUsMRAr4OAJ43Chdu4w3VW5lioGSTl5VihyYNugCeNK7Y +2MXHm4+zuEFn3ti+zfk1Jg= =uX6z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_2074436656P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301211626.h0LGQ88B001307>