From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 27 8:53: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kottan-labs.bgsu.edu (kottan-labs.bgsu.edu [129.1.148.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C43337B41B for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 5284 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 11:55:59 -0500 Received: from raoul.bgsu.edu (HELO gmx.net) (129.1.148.16) by kottan-labs.bgsu.edu with SMTP; 27 Mar 2002 11:55:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3CA1F99B.9030009@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:55:55 -0500 From: Raoul Schroeder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helge Oldach , FreeBSD stable Subject: Re: HEADS UP: sendmail 8.12.2 MFC'ed References: <200203262226.XAA27664@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > >Because they don't ...stay unused. It's just convenient to have a >standard, well- and widely-known piece of software around. You may not >like it but both Sendmail and BIND are the de facto standards. Period. > Isn't that an argument that Microsoft normally uses..? *ducks* I don't mind sendmail being the default, what I do mind is that after every upgrade I need to find the new sendmail binary, delete it, and point a link towards the qmail sendmail binary. If all stayed in the same place, then there would be no problem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message