From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 5 08:32:48 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA03554 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles198.castles.com [208.214.165.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA03549 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA03868; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 08:29:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199901051629.IAA03868@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" cc: "Alfred Perlstein" , "Blaz Zupan" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel cannot mount root with new bootblocks In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jan 1999 10:11:58 CST." <00d001be38c6$200aeea0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 08:29:13 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > In light of all the boot problems I have seen, are there still plans to go > ELF Kernel tomorrow? I think you will see that people are going to take a > wait and see aproach with CURRENT if this happens. Most of the problems with booting are finger trouble at the moment; I can't see any reason why we shouldn't go ahead as planned. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message