From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 09:37:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7770516A4DD; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mdmay74@internode.on.net) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EFE43D46; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 09:37:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mdmay74@internode.on.net) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ppp217-176.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.122.217.176]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k859baSu081306; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:07:37 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from mdmay74@internode.on.net) Message-ID: <44FD45C3.7090907@internode.on.net> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:09:15 +0930 From: Matthew May User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas , Daniel Gerzo , Tom Rhodes References: <20060904120036.8441716A4F5@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060904120036.8441716A4F5@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: mount(8) async description X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 09:37:39 -0000 On 2006-09-04 07:36, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Hi Daniel and everyone else, > > In retrospect, having let this sink down for a few days, I think we > should also bear in mind Ruslan Ermilov's comments about referring to > the reader in second person. Is there any way we can keep the same > meaning, stress the dangers of using ``-o async'' *and* avoid using > ``you'' in the text? > > This is definitely far across the borders of nit-picking, but perhaps > we can use something like this (based on the OpenBSD version, with the > fixes suggested by Matthew May , and using > the backup/newfs text suggested by Daniel): > > async All I/O to the file system should be done asynchronously. > This is a dengerous flag to set, since it does not guarantee > that the file system structure on the disk will remain > consistent. For this reason, the `async' flag should not be > used unless some application-specific data recovery > mechanism is present, or recreation of the file system is > not a problem. > > Does this look less wordy and still useful as a change? > > - Giorgos Hi Giorgos, After a quick s/dengerous/dangerous/ I'd be happy with that :-) MAtt.