From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 27 08:26:31 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA22C16A41F;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:26:31 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jura@networks.ru)
Received: from networks.ru (orange.networks.ru [80.249.138.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46243D46;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:26:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from jura@networks.ru)
Received: from [81.195.67.217] (HELO Jura)
	by networks.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.8)
	with ESMTPS id 2041527; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:26:26 +0400
Message-ID: <00a801c5dacf$db3b7700$6504010a@Jura>
From: "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <jura@networks.ru>
To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org>
References: <21137.1130401220@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:24:30 +0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MySQL Performance 6.0rc1 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 08:26:32 -0000

>>Check gettimeofday syscall, it follows every I/O syscall, I think
>>our gettimeofday is tooooooo expensive, if we can directly get time from
>>memory, the performance will be improved further.
It's true:
run next on same PC от freebsd and linux  and compare

struct timeval start;
struct timeval stop;
struct timeval tmp;

register unsigned i;
unsigned difft;

gettimeofday(&start, NULL);
for(i=0;i<1000000; i++) {
        gettimeofday(&tmp, NULL);
}

gettimeofday(&stop, NULL);
difft= (unsigned) ( (stop.tv_sec - start.tv_sec)*1000000 + (stop.tv_usec -
start.tv_usec));
printf("%u\n", difft);


Jura