From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 26 03:09:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA4C16A4EB; Fri, 26 May 2006 03:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F72E43D4C; Fri, 26 May 2006 03:09:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4Q38sAH034280; Thu, 25 May 2006 21:09:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44767146.30808@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 21:08:54 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <44745CF6.1040402@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <44745CF6.1040402@icyb.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: state of fs/udf X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 03:09:02 -0000 Andriy Gapon wrote: > It seems that UDF fs has been in not-well-supported state for a while > now. It seems that Scott Long, original author and maintainer, has moved > on to other more important (and, perhaps, interesting) things. > ("perhaps" - because RE does not seem to be too exciting on the first > glance) > > Meanwhile, there are several bugs still opened for UDF. Some of them are > pretty obvious, some with good patches, some not so trivial, some > unhelpful and some are mine :-) > I think the following PRs are good candidates for review and possible > inclusion into source: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/77234 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/78987 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/92040 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/84983 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/90521 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/97786 > > Also, from our private conversations I know that Bruce Evans has even > more fixes for more problems and better fixes for some bugs described in > the above PRs. Those patches that I personally submitted do WorkForMe > (TM), but I think that Bruce has much better understanding of VFS stuff > and done much better job. > > Would some committer be so kind to adopt UDF, review the PRs and fix at > least the most obvious bugs before 6.2 ? > I personally promise to help with testing and discussing things. > Sorry I've been remiss. I'll look at these this weekend. Scott