From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 04:53:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00F837B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 04:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA6C43FBD for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 04:53:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19hT4r-0005GA-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:55:37 +0700 Received: from iclub.nsu.ru ([193.124.215.97] ident=root) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19hT4q-0005F0-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:55:36 +0700 Received: from iclub.nsu.ru (fjoe@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6TBr15B085612; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:53:01 +0700 (NSS) (envelope-from fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru) Received: (from fjoe@localhost) by iclub.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6TBr1fc085609; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:53:01 +0700 (NSS) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:53:00 +0700 From: Max Khon To: Paolo Pisati Message-ID: <20030729115300.GA85370@iclub.nsu.ru> References: <20030728224737.GA47439@newluxor.skynet.org> <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: flag@libero.it, freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD_Net Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x' X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:53:08 -0000 hi, there! On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > And while you are listening, i can show u something else... =) > > I have NETGRAPH in my kernel, and this is what i get when i > try to load ng_ether the first time: > > [root@newluxor root]# kldload ng_ether > module_register: module netgraph already exists! > linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17 > kldload: can't load ng_ether: Exec format error > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > it fails to load the node... yes, kernel loader in RELENG_4 fails when some of the dependancies are linked into the kernel. > [root@newluxor root]# kldload ng_ether > > while the second time it works... =O > > [root@newluxor root]# kldunload ng_ether > kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy > > and if i try to unload it, it always says that it's busy: > i think this is due to the inability to delete > an interface, isn't it? /fjoe