From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Aug 17 7:52:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from relay.iunet.it (relay.iunet.it [192.106.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107D14C95 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 07:51:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ccau@itsyn.it) Received: from server1.ecttrieste.com ([151.4.19.2]) by relay.iunet.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA04180 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:51:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 0 ([192.168.10.5]) by server1.ecttrieste.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-57526U100L2S100V35) with SMTP id com for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01bee8c0$32e2c5c0$050aa8c0@0> Reply-To: "Corrado Cau" From: "Corrado Cau" To: Subject: -current and SMP Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 16:52:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm following with the greatest interest the recent discussions about how to better and make more robust the SMP version of FreeBSD, especially about processor affinity. In my opinion this is a cornerstone of a good SMP implementation. Did some of the fixes make it into the more recent -current snapshots? or we still are at patches level? btw, I found an interesting "how-to" about SMP on linux.com. Ban me from freebsd-* if you wish :-), but there is way too little documentation on SMP around and that article was quite appealing to me. (http://linux.com/howto/Parallel-Processing-HOWTO-1.html) Corrado To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message