Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 18:05:16 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>, Dan Moschuk <dan@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf files.i386 src/sys/kern kern_fork.c src/sys/libkern arc4random.c src/sys/sys libkern.h Message-ID: <199911300205.SAA13833@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911291751510.65191-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:There will probably end up being 20 or so randomized features in the
:kernel, most of them trivial (~1 line) patches. As long as they're
:sysctl'able, is it really necessary to have each of them optionable?
What if we just has a general security randomization option that
applied to all of them, and then a sysctl to cover each of them?
That would cover my concerns.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911300205.SAA13833>