Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 11:55:06 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "at" command and mail Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK3pOo%2BzvHzrD-EdusWWA1VF4CokeFvLn-3qJvsFQ6xDAQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net> References: <201109031639.KAA25689@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> wrote: > I'm setting up a FreeBSD appliance that won't be running a mail daemon. I'd > like the at(8) command to be there for scheduling of commands, but do not > see any way to prevent it from trying to send mail after it executes a > command. (There's not even a command line option that says "do not mail," or > at least I can't find one.) Am I missing something, or does at(8) always > expect to be able to send mail? If so, would it be worth implementing an > atrun.conf configuration file that makes it optional and possibly sets other > defaults for at(8)? > If you redirect the output from the command to /dev/null or other file, you shouldn't recieve an email unless you've also specified -m. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK3pOo%2BzvHzrD-EdusWWA1VF4CokeFvLn-3qJvsFQ6xDAQ>