From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 16 08:19:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 26B2A16A4D0; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7BC2143D2F; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:19:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAG8Iu6D039262;
	Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:18:56 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:16:40 +0100."
             <200411160916.47131.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> 
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:18:56 +0100
Message-ID: <39261.1100593136@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: TEST: phk_bufwork patchfile 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:19:01 -0000

In message <200411160916.47131.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net>, Emanuel Strobl writes:
>for 6-curr, but a 5.3-stable wich will go in production next week. Is it 
>possible to apply the framework to -stable?

Not without some work.

>My intents are to make storage available for jails via regular files which 
>is at the moment no option since performance gets horrible. If I understand 
>things right then this framework should improove performance dramatically 
>when e. g. copying /sys to /vnode_backed_md0.

Not particularly.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.