From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Feb 1 16:31: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1349637B400 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0542.cvx40-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([216.244.44.32] helo=mindspring.com) by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16Wo4V-0002Xb-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:30:25 -0800 Message-ID: <3C5B3315.3F07A731@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 16:30:13 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Murray Cc: Bruce Evans , Juha Juntunen , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __P macro question References: <20020202012011.U3304-100000@gamplex.bde.org> <200202011438.g11EbxE98677@greenpeace.grondar.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Murray wrote: > So, does this not effectively make a rule, "You will _always_ properly > prototype functions, and make sure that these proper prototypes are in > scope before you use (and define) the functions."? I think it means "The compiler SHALL complain if this is not so". Right now, it doesn't complain. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message