From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 3 12:46:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B6D37B401; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-106-47.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.106.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B992743EB2; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0A466C61; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E0241348; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Cc: Peter Pentchev , portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS on sparc64 Message-ID: <20021203204611.GA38099@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20021127155317.GG375@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20021203155143.22703.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021203155143.22703.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:51:21PM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > Well, I apologize if I say something stupid but if a port requires > pthread support... not linking against it won't make the port work. It might > not even get the port to compile. > Wouldn't be better if a stub (with no internal code) version > of libc_r was cooked specially for sparc64? Just to see if the ports > build in that ARCH? Since nothing will really work until we have a > working thread implemention for sparc64. I think we can just let them fail for now, unless they have a switch that lets them build w/o threads support. Kris --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE97RgTWry0BWjoQKURAtTRAKDtdGyWHJdlXg8iANnBdcTCQB8itACg0yUp WczVrFsulivHj9s09fNFt/U= =dzfa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message