From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 8 12:04:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0A816A4DA for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:04:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4C443D69 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 12:04:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from fl-71-54-28-212.dhcp.embarqhsd.net ([71.54.28.212] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by pop-satin.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1FzBXZ-00048A-00; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 08:04:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 08:07:11 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: Randy Pratt Message-Id: <20060708080711.777b349a.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20060703191826.1cf56769.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> References: <20060703191826.1cf56769.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mezz7@cox.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 12:04:09 -0000 On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:18:26 -0400 Randy Pratt wrote: > On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0500 > "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel > > to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using > > x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am happy to move from fluxbox to > > something like fluxbox-old (got any better name?) but I will not maintain > > it as I shall drop it to ports@FreeBSD.org. If I get no reply until > > Fluxbox released at 1.0 then the 0.1.14 version will be gone for good. > > I'm using the older fluxbox and also know of a few others who are > also dragging their feet. I've actually had my attention elsewhere > and wasn't following the fluxbox-devel but I'll give it a whirl on a > test box in the next few days. I doubt I'd request that the old > version remain in the tree in any event since I'd keep it along with a > few other local ports if I really wanted to stick with the old version. > > Thanks for the notice though so I can start paying attention :-) Just a follow-up to my previous comments. I switched to the fluxbox-devel-1.0rc2_1 version yesterday and have not seen any problems. I left my old ~/.fluxbox directory and configs and there didn't seem to be any problems. No reason that I can see to keep the old version around. Randy --