From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 24 21:18:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B889453 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rainer@ultra-secure.de) Received: from mail.ultra-secure.de (mail.ultra-secure.de [78.47.114.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0FE1EDD for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27135 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2013 21:18:25 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 27130, pid: 27132, t: 0.0704s scanners: attach: 1.4.0 clamav: 0.97.3/m:54/d:17081 Received: from unknown (HELO ?212.71.117.82?) (rainer@ultra-secure.de@212.71.117.82) by mail.ultra-secure.de with ESMTPA; 24 Apr 2013 21:18:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp From: Rainer Duffner In-Reply-To: <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 23:18:24 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org> <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3> <74CA0A5F-63EF-4B1B-B237-7A8DB76333A6@hub.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:18:31 -0000 Am 24.04.2013 um 23:02 schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" : >=20 > On 2013-04-24, at 12:48 , Rainer Duffner = wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> In the NFS mount options. >> I've re-done my tests and it still seems to be a problem.=20 >=20 > 'k, just to clarify =85 your tests are with the Broadcom chipset(s)? = I have an Intel card on order, so will run tests against that as soon as = it gets here to see how it changes =85 >=20 No, with the intel card then. Even then it was slow. > Just curious, but what are you running for tests? I noticed it = visually, but other then using something like iozone21, not sure what = is useful for coming up with a benchmark =85 I've just ran something like dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 on the nfsmount on the client. mount 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test=20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 27.826971 secs (35936358 bytes/sec) mount -o nfsv3,rsize=3D131072,wsize=3D131072 = 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test =20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 78.594951 secs (12723464 bytes/sec) mount -o nfsv3,rsize=3D65536,wsize=3D65536 = 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test =20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 68.243100 secs (14653496 bytes/sec) mount -o nfsv3,rsize=3D32768,wsize=3D32768 = 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test =20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 13.326178 secs (75040270 bytes/sec) mount -o nfsv3,rsize=3D16384,wsize=3D16384 = 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test =20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 11.965145 secs (83576086 bytes/sec) mount -o nfsv3,rsize=3D8182,wsize=3D8192 = 10.10.91.226:/zones/userdata/shares/nfs/test-export = /home/mpd-test/nfs-test=20 dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dbla bs=3D1000000 count=3D1000 1000+0 records in 1000+0 records out 1000000000 bytes transferred in 11.861178 secs (84308657 bytes/sec)