From owner-freebsd-small Fri Nov 6 21:58:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA28572 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 21:58:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bolero-x.rahul.net (bolero.rahul.net [192.160.13.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id VAA28566 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 21:58:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randyd@rahul.net) Received: from bolero.rahul.net by bolero-x.rahul.net with SMTP id AA13048 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Fri, 6 Nov 1998 21:58:04 -0800 Received: from dyn126.rahul.net [206.61.225.126] by bolero.rahul.net with smtp (Exim 1.71 #13) id 0zc1MN-0003Jo-00; Fri, 6 Nov 1998 21:56:32 -0800 X-Sender: randyd@bolero.rahul.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.2 Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 21:40:54 -0800 To: Andrzej Bialecki From: Randy Devol Subject: Re: *BSD small effort Cc: picoBSD In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:14 PM 11/6/98 +0100, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > >Better yet, don't port it but devise some other way to build the image so >that its components are easily changeable... This is IMO the biggest >disdavantage of picobsd for now. Do you mean configurable kernels without recompiling? How is that different from LKM's? (I know I don't want to invent/reinvent a scheme like LKM's.) -=O=- Randy In "A Scanner Darkly," was Philip K. Dick foreshadowing Web commerce: "Someday, he thought, it'll be mandatory that we all sell the McDonald's hamburger as well as buy it; we'll sell it back and forth to each other forever from our living rooms." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message