From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Aug  5 08:22:46 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50559B4C34
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  5 Aug 2015 08:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17B2D76
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  5 Aug 2015 08:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t758Mkl2054464
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:22:46 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 201257] [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] dns/knot2: update to 2.0.0
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:22:46 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: erwin@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-201257-13-w4hwV0dX7p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-201257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-201257-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:22:47 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201257

Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |erwin@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #2 from Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Leo Vandewoestijne from comment #0)

Hi Leo,

It depends on what you think the users expect to be the default version, that
should be the knot port.  I think the developers recommend knot2 as the default
version, in which case you're right in renaming the current port to knot1 and
knot2 to knot.  On the other hand, since the syntax of the configuration file
changes, it might be better to leave knot2 as is to not surprise our users when
they upgrade, and things suddenly break (at least, they would have to have a
big warning in pkg-message), and maybe move knot to knot1 to not suggest it is
the recommended port.  What do you think?

Erwin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.