Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:19:20 +0900
From:      Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/resolv res_comp.c
Message-ID:  <ygehcg8kh6f.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
In-Reply-To: <47B6EBF5.3030505@gmail.com>
References:  <200802160016.m1G0GnFB046558@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080216024541.GA31498@nagual.pp.ru> <20080215.233427.1598351542.imp@bsdimp.com> <863artw4wh.fsf@ds4.des.no> <47B6EBF5.3030505@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

>>>>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:58:13 +0100
>>>>> Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com> said:

pawel> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
> "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
>> Plus there was a very long, very heated thread about removing _ as a
>> valid name years ago.  Have conditions changed since then?  Frankly,
>> I'd like to have seen a change like this discussed more widely.  There
>> was much debate before, and there turned out to be good reasons for
>> omitting the _.  I just can't recall them now.
>=20
> There are valid reasons for allowing it.  Somebody[tm] (I'll leave it up
> to you to guess who) thought it was a good idea to use _ in DNS names
> used for automatic detection of web proxies and domain controllers, IIRC.
>=20

pawel> BIND allows it in SRV records but not in A records.

Not all DNS servers are BIND.  Though use of `_' in hostname violates
RFC, some implementations of DNS server allow it, and it is used
actually.

Sincerely,

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ygehcg8kh6f.wl%ume>