From owner-freebsd-security Sun Feb 17 15:12: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from leaf.lumiere.net (leaf.lumiere.net [208.44.192.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC9137B402; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:11:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by leaf.lumiere.net (Postfix, from userid 1082) id 4A39DCD36; Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:11:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:11:54 -0800 From: Derrick John Klise To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does Xvnc from ports obey hosts.allow? Message-ID: <20020217151154.A89128@leaf.lumiere.net> References: <20020216232604.B26063@cowbert.2y.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020216232604.B26063@cowbert.2y.net>; from sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net on Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:26:04PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:26:04PM -0500, Peter C. Lai wrote: > I know Wolfram Golger wrote a patch for Xvnc 3.3.2r2 back in 1998 > allowing one to compile Xvnc to use tcpwrappers. > > Is this patch native with the ports version of Xvnc, and does it > automagically build with this or not? (since > tcpwrappers already come installed with freebsd). The Xvnc library isn't linked with libwrap (which, if I remember correctly, is the tcpwrapper library): addled(ttyp4)~> ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvnc /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvnc: libz.so.2 => /usr/lib/libz.so.2 (0x2815b000) libm.so.2 => /usr/lib/libm.so.2 (0x28168000) libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28184000) addled(ttyp4)~> So I'm pretty sure it doesn't (include the patch). -- Derrick John Klise "I went into a general store, and they wouldn't sell me anything specific". -- Steven Wright To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message