From owner-freebsd-scsi Mon Apr 20 16:22:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA22955 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 16:22:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pluto.plutotech.com (mail.plutotech.com [206.168.67.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA22846 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 23:22:02 GMT (envelope-from gibbs@plutotech.com) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by pluto.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA17435; Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:21:39 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199804202321.RAA17435@pluto.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ahh, I think I see part of the problem.. (CAM bouncing) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Apr 1998 22:42:17 GMT." <353cce7e.94813933@mail.cetlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 17:17:50 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >After reading this I don't understand what's broken about the 445S. >Could you put it in more simple language? I have some 445C adapters >and I wonder if they have the same characteristic. The 445S cannot properly transfer data to or from any address between (16MB * n) + BiosAddres and (16MB * n) + BiosAddress + BiosSize For n > 0 I do not believe that the 445C has this problem. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message