From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 29 22:33:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA06011 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:33:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from SIMULTAN.CH (eunet-gw.simultan.ch [194.191.191.82] (may be forged)) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA06006 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:33:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tseidmann@simultan.ch) Received: from simultan.ch (wsaltis-053.SIMULTAN.CH [192.92.128.53]) by SIMULTAN.CH (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA29722; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:33:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <36395DB5.E8854464@simultan.ch> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 07:33:25 +0100 From: Thomas Seidmann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@NUXI.com CC: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current References: <19981029014905.E26396@nuxi.com> <199810291238.OAA21028@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <19981029135412.Q25158@nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien wrote: > > > with it. One of the advantages (for me) about the KAME stack is that we > > also get their IPSEC stuff, while with INRIA being in France, it makes > > IMHO, this is a big issue. We are trying to correct the insecurities of > the existing protocols. W/o IPSec we are emasculating these efforts. I agree; this _is_ a big issue. We'd get IPsec with INRIA, too. > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) Thomas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message