Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:21:25 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Thomas Moyer <tmm324@psu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two Questions ( atapicam related and scheduler related) Message-ID: <20041018212125.GA896@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <417425D7.9010909@psu.edu> References: <417425D7.9010909@psu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-10-18 16:21, Thomas Moyer <tmm324@psu.edu> wrote: > I been following the progress of the 5.3 release and I thought they were > changing the shceduler from SCHED_4BSD to SCHED_ULE? Also I recently > acquired a DVD+-RW and was wondering if I should stick with using burncd > and growisfs with the standard /dev/acd0 or should I switch to using > atapicam? Is there any sort of a performance gain? What are the > advantages and disadvantages of both? FYI, Using burncd has been broken for me in -CURRENT since early June. The process reaches the stage of fixating, but then my kernel panics with a message for `illegal phase'. I didn't really *need* to write CD-ROMs until today, and I finally tried atapicam with cdrecord. It works like a charm here.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018212125.GA896>