From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 00:06:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192BF16A4CE; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:06:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECDA43D2F; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2I062Ka011115; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:06:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: David Xu From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:03:32 +0800." <423A1AD4.2050207@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:06:02 +0100 Message-ID: <11114.1111104362@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW/PERF] kern_thread.c tid allocation patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:06:15 -0000 In message <423A1AD4.2050207@freebsd.org>, David Xu writes: >I have tested it, yes, it is slight faster than current code. Cool! Are there any tests we need to run it through before I commit it ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.