From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Nov 16 20:49:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from cs4.cs.ait.ac.th (cs4.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A6637B479; Thu, 16 Nov 2000 20:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by cs4.cs.ait.ac.th (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA15625; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:48:53 +0700 (GMT+0700) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA13563; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:48:51 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:48:51 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200011170448.LAA13563@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Authentication-Warning: banyan.cs.ait.ac.th: on set sender to on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th using -f From: Olivier Nicole To: c4@worldclass.jolt.nu Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Tobias Fredriksson on Fri, 17 Nov 2000 05:34:26 +0100 (CET)) Subject: Re: Multiple interfaces on same subnet References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tobias, Having 2 dual ethernet cards, how can you reach 800mbps? 2*2*100=400 in each direction, I suppose I beleive the server should handle traffic from the 2 internal subnets as well as some traffic from outside? It should be a very light server to be able to deliver data at the rate you mentionned. I like freebsd, but I am not sure it can handle the load. As for security reasons, spliting the servers could be a good solution too. Olivier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message