From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 9 06:48:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D90210656BB for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17D48FC15 for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n596mVSi004634; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:48:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n596mVpj004631; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:48:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:48:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20090609040443.GA56070@dan.emsphone.com> Message-ID: References: <26face530906081813x5abd6d28i27137b76b0be41c@mail.gmail.com> <20090609040443.GA56070@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kelly Jones , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need a filesystem with "unlimited" inodes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:48:49 -0000 > At this point you're sort of out of the general-use category :) You want > ZFS. Or rather, you don't want to try and fsck a UFS filesystem with 200M > inodes. The three drawbacks I can think of to ZFS are it's hard to boot ZFS is very trendy now, but isn't it allocating space in 4KB chunks?