Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 21:29:36 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: henrichhartzer@tuta.io Cc: Freebsd Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Quarterly backport for multimedia/x265 patch Message-ID: <24B4A376-10C1-49DF-ADBD-9956BEC565B8@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <O4M0p2A--3-9@tuta.io> References: <O4M0p2A--3-9@tuta.io>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 Aug 2024, at 19:13, henrichhartzer@tuta.io wrote: >=20 > There's been a lot of packages that haven't been built in quarterly = because of a checksum mismatch. I think this affected latest as well for = a little while, but that's been resolved. >=20 > Here's some information on the extent of the issue:=20 > = https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/disappearance-of-desktop-applications-f= irefox-thunderbird-from-repositories.94550/ >=20 > And a bug for a quick fix: = https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280833 >=20 > Moving forward, it sounds like this is not the first time this has = happened. Something about the patch format coming back slightly = differently from Bitbucket. Could we move the patch to the patches/ = folder so this can't be an issue in the future, or could we update to = x265 3.6, which doesn't need it? The problem is that Bitbucket appends a line with the Git version = they're using at the end of the patch, or at least they don't filter it = out. This should probably be reported to Bitbucket as a bug, but past = experiences with Atlassian are not encouraging. :-) -Dimitry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24B4A376-10C1-49DF-ADBD-9956BEC565B8>