From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 16 05:51:12 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA29021 for current-outgoing; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 05:51:12 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA29015 for ; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 05:51:09 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA21614; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 05:51:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id FAA00127; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 05:51:00 -0700 Message-Id: <199504161251.FAA00127@corbin.Root.COM> To: "Nickolay N. Dudorov" cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ipfw/Ipacct questions In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Apr 95 19:43:16 +0700." <199504161243.TAA00756@gw.itfs.nsk.su> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Sun, 16 Apr 1995 05:50:59 -0700 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Ipfirewall/Ipaccounting code in current >only partially enabled/disabled by IPFIREWALL/IPACCT kernel >config options. Why does this code contains run time tests >(f.e. if(ip_acct_cnt_ptr == NULL) ) when I config kernel >without IPFIREWALL/IPACCT ? Is it possible to #ifdef all Because ipfw is also an LKM. -DG