From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 26 19:42:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6D0106566C for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de) Received: from mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (mrelay1.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.106]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0A68FC0A for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (www.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.2]) by mrelay1.uni-hannover.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0QJgDIS000759; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:42:15 +0100 Received: from pmp.uni-hannover.de (theq.pmp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.117.4]) by www.pmp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E20ED24; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:42:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:42:13 +0100 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= To: Tommi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E4tti?= Message-Id: <20100126204213.033bbebe.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Albert-Einstein-Institut (MPI =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Gravitationsphysik & IGP =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t?= Hannover) X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-PMX-Version: 5.5.9.388399, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2010.1.26.193039 Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , Dan Naumov Subject: Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:42:17 -0000 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:53:20 +0900 Tommi L=E4tti wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues: TL> Well AFAIK WD certifies that there's no extra risk involved unless you TL> go over 300.000 park cycles. On the other hand, my 9 month 1.5tb green TL> drive has over 200.000 cycles. I think the RE2 drives I have here are certified for 600k cycles. TL> Maybe check if you can disable the idle timer using WDIDLE3... works TL> for my drives (although it did some strange things to one out of the 6 TL> drives --> decreased reported sector count and the zfs invalidated the TL> pool :/ ). I can only encourage everyone having this problem to report to WD's support about this. Today I received an update for the firmware of RE4-drives (which I did not try out yet). IMHO, the more people complain about these issues, the higher is the chance that WD will do something about it. cu Gerrit