From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 00:37:05 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6809B37B401; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 00:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchhz01.viatech.com.cn (ip-167-164-97-218.anlai.com
	[218.97.164.167])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 75D6343F3F; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 00:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from davidxu@viatech.com.cn)
Received: from davidw2k (ip-240-1-168-192.rev.dyxnet.com [192.168.1.240]) by
	exchhz01.viatech.com.cn with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
	Version 5.5.2650.21)	id HLDQPJTJ; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:22:32 +0800
Message-ID: <000501c2fcd8$aee16de0$f001a8c0@davidw2k>
From: "David Xu" <davidxu@viatech.com.cn>
To: <julian@elischer.org>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
References:
	<20030406.221733.12213570.imp@bsdimp.com><Pine.BSF.4.21.0304062300100.55025-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
	<20030407.012315.52907595.imp@bsdimp.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:38:29 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com
cc: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:37:05 -0000


----- Original Message -----=20
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: <julian@elischer.org>
Cc: <davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG>; <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>; =
<freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>; <core@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit.


> In message: =
<Pine.BSF.4.21.0304062300100.55025-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
>             Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes:
> : We are in a bind..
> : Jeff has committed changes that have broken the KSE view of signals.
> : however he is out of the picture for a week now.
> : This means that we can not pass our changes past him as we try fix =
it.
> : This is made more difficult because it appears that 1:1 threads is
> : broken at the moment, (see mail comments in -current),
>=20
> Patches have been posted.  Have you tried them yet?
>=20
> : so we can not test our changes against the 1:1 threads code.
>=20
> This is related to the LAZY stuff that was committed.
>=20
> : All I want is a comment that assuming we take care, if jeff gets =
back=20
> : and finds that we've broken something for him, that we are not=20
> : nailed to a tree for it.
>=20
> Jeff's mail said he'd be gone only 3 more days.  Things for most
> people aren't broken, so there's no need to rush, imho.  I also think
> Jeff has limited access to the net, so he should be able to review
> things.  I don't think that there's an urgent need for core to
> override the normal workings of the project at this time.  See if you
> can catch him with this limited access.  I'm uneasy about granting an
> exception to the rules when I haven't even seen a proposed patch.
>=20
> That's just my personal opinion.
>=20
> Warner

So I don't think you are fair enough!
I ever posted a message said that jeff's patch had bug,
the bug is signal lost, but he obviously didn't fixed it,
and you guy allowed him to commit it, please search arch list
about 1:1 thread! I don't think delaying some days of libthr
change to kernel would hurt anything, I had reported
the problem and why did core still allow him to commit?

David Xu