From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 19 02:16:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9D16A417; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.c0mplx.org (home.c0mplx.org [IPv6:2001:14b0:200::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBC813C46E; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from pi by home.c0mplx.org with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IXp7M-000CSZ-IX; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:16:44 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 04:16:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Daichi GOTO Message-ID: <20070919021644.GG2061@home.c0mplx.org> References: <200709141103.18612.h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> <20070914110024.G14481@fledge.watson.org> <46EBEA18.3080800@ongs.co.jp> <20070915170104.GF2061@home.c0mplx.org> <46EF6386.9050700@ongs.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46EF6386.9050700@ongs.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unionfs patchset p19 commit? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:16:45 -0000 Hi! > >>I have a big hope to get merged into FreeBSD until > >>7-RELEASE. Progress is step by step slowly, but going > >>forward absolutely. If you have interest in unionfs > >>improvements, push your passion to re@ and fs@ committers ;-) > > > >Did you have a chance to look into this ? > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-June/035798.html > Already we have fixed above issue. [...] I'm compiling this patch on my test system right now. Another issue is userland support for unionfs, e.g. in fstat, as described on this page: http://c0mplx.org/src/fstat-unionfs-patch/ Do you plan to analyse/investigate this topic ? There's another topic if one uses unionfs in jail() setups: How to backup the files, and only those files that a different from the base ? If I traverse a mounted unionfs, how do I know where data is coming from, the lower mount or the higher mount ? If I can't tell the difference, I'll backup quite a lot of stuff multiple times. I've experimented a little and found no easy way to tell lower from upper unless I open the file (which sounds expensive). Have a look at http://c0mplx.org/src/isunionfs.c -- does this sound like a way to go ? -- pi@c0mplx.org +49 171 3101372 13 years to go !