From owner-freebsd-www  Mon Nov  2 15:05:00 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-www>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA22491
          for www-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 15:05:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-www)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22477;
          Mon, 2 Nov 1998 15:04:59 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27161;
	Mon, 2 Nov 1998 15:05:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: www@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: asami@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 15:05:15 -0800
Message-ID: <27157.910047915@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I hate to sound like an HTML heretic, but might not the use of tables
make this page and the pages under it far more efficient in their use
of screen real-estate?  Every time I use this resource to look for
something, I'm struck by how long and yet terse the pages are for the
bigger categories and I think "gosh, there's just got to be a more
compact way of supplying this information."

What do the HTML artists here think?

- Jordan