From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 13:13:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C751065670 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC478FC19 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 4so971746eyf.9 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:13:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=B0RefnWtwB8lB3BtKJ8U2/gVE1JqwVWjNgCzrl4mmU4=; b=SlVmi3Bqaus7xIK67QM6SnSeMo6ExTNliAZ6DzAsFU2srOuFCLJUVUdctMtNimbJhz WcKs5sW5uvMnSW3mdi0EY1fqSqB4t/7NEvKZMxcPPLNppluXWYAktD+IWrA4wAqam/TO Yr52n7ODwPVYIBLPdvrK9EDHfcMFN/GMvt90E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=Cm8T35RV/hSBOeggcyjxzPd8V4MIjLLT6tjJfanoMfnKYGGjy7chce80y22vz+nN32 tk5AkZdZeEKoa/EpU9bOYiVJAQy50bmf43u50oQN6BP7RrkHfziYzMmm9oJnZvkFpoiB DA1kKtswNUz9fzojlj+g0IYM8NC9r7QTriqkY= Received: by 10.211.146.1 with SMTP id y1mr4603728ebn.0.1253625209188; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (95-24-211-3.broadband.corbina.ru [95.24.211.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm205650eyg.41.2009.09.22.06.13.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:13:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: Ed Schouten References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:12:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> (Ed Schouten's message of "Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:26:57 +0200") Message-ID: <86ab0n2kdi.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:13:30 -0000 Ed Schouten writes: > Hi all, > > At the DevSummit in Cambridge we briefly discussed including tmux(1) in > the base system. We recently had window(1) there, but unfortunately > window(1) was a very limited tool, compared to tools like screen(1) and > tmux(1). Why tmux(1) and not screen(1)? Well, simple. The first has a > better license and very active maintenance. I think some simple tool like dtach(1) but with BSD-friendly license would be better suited for base system. And unlike mg(1) which is preferable to have in /rescue I don't think there is a reason to have tmux(1) in base other than avoiding ports.