Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:13:23 +0200
From:      Toni Schmidbauer <toni@stderror.at>
To:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: portscan looks like....
Message-ID:  <20040824121323.GA626@stderror.at>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040824000315.01a74178@mail.dc2.adelphia.net>
References:  <5.2.1.1.0.20040824000315.01a74178@mail.dc2.adelphia.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:12:10AM -0400, Bob Ababurko wrote:
> PORT     STATE SERVICE
> 22/tcp   open  ssh
> 25/tcp   open  smtp
> 80/tcp   open  http
> 111/tcp  open  rpcbind
> 1023/tcp open  netvenuechat

with sockstat(1) its possible to list which daemon is listing on
which port. the column PID shows the corresponding process id.
a simple kill <pid> should be enough to stop that daemon.=20

but indeed 1023 looks interesting. if you really don't know which
kind of daemon is listing on that port, i would try telneting to it.
hopefully it's not some kind of root backdoor :-)

hth,
toni
--=20
Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass er nicht | toni at stderror dot at
mehr irrt, der hat auch zu arbeiten aufgehoert    | Toni Schmidbauer
-- Max Planck                                     |

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBKzDju/mjSj7RMocRAlyKAJ0RFXD7xeH1zsLwE/L/HEIcHtDZ4ACfVg3W
HutXpWAGoWJsomdpnKc2iZM=
=SY9K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040824121323.GA626>