From owner-freebsd-security  Thu Oct  5 15:39:15 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 89F2137B503; Thu,  5 Oct 2000 15:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e95McUX01279;
	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:38:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>,
	freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>,
	"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>,
	Ralph Huntington <rjh@mohawk.net>
Subject: Re: Stable branch 
In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> 
   of "Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:37:46 EDT." <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001005153142.36174A-100000@fledge.watson.org> 
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:38:29 -0700
Message-ID: <1275.970785509@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 1) Increased scrutiny of MFC's in advance so that there's less chance of

That's perhaps doable, though others have already commented on the
difficulties of getting "scrutiny" before the fact in this project so
I won't belabor the point.

> 2) Make release tags into branches, so that ERRATA and other relevant

That scares me.  I don't like the idea of n-way merges.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message