From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 6 11:11:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EF416A4CE; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 11:11:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-15.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.50.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC9343D58; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BX26o-000KN0-2u; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:11:05 +0200 Message-ID: <40C35E35.6080803@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 20:11:01 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <200406060106.i5616XNX076254@repoman.freebsd.org> <40C2CE39.5030402@fillmore-labs.com> <1086541625.34425.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <40C350AB.2070407@fillmore-labs.com> <1086542154.34425.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1086542154.34425.4.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portlint Makefileports/devel/portlint/src portlint.pl X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 18:11:08 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 13:13, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> >>>This was supposed to solve a problem that I've personally hit a few >>>times. It was just another check to make sure PKGNAME agrees with what >>>is in distinfo. >> >>Could you give me an example? It might be interesting to add this to my >>rework of the distfiles stuff in PR 67361: >> >> >>If it is deemed useful to integrate distinfo into the ports Makefile one >>way or the other, it might not be worth to make efforts to check for >>stuff that might be obsolete in the future. > > For instance, when fixing hyphenated PORTNAMEs, I sometimes forget to > adjust DISTNAME, and thus the port is broken. I always remember a > portlint run, but it would never catch the problem. > > Joe So you need a consistency check without fetching the actual distfiles? I guess it makes sense to include this into bsd.port.mk, since the involved code is non-trivial, but the logic is already in place. Should I add a target to my patch, and what kind of output do you expect? -Oliver