From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun 27 09:12:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA29439
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 09:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ice.cold.org (cold.org [206.81.134.103])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29428
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 27 Jun 1997 09:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (brandon@localhost)
	by ice.cold.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA22839;
	Fri, 27 Jun 1997 10:11:42 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 10:11:42 -0600 (MDT)
From: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: so..? Re: Be net friendly, add an 'abuse' alias to the distributed , aliases file 
In-Reply-To: <199706270845.KAA16376@nietzsche.bowtie.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970627100347.22810B-100000@ice.cold.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Just a thought.. why dont we add an 'abuse' alias to the default aliases
> > file, since its becoming a pretty standard address (like postmaster, and
> > whatnot).
> 
> See RFC2142.

So.. are we going to add it to the standard aliases for root..?  You
didn't need to convince me that it was a standard--that was my point
behind requesting it to be added to the default list.. 8)

I just checked /usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src/aliases from the 3.0
distribution and they are still the same old ones.. 

-Brandon Gillespie