From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 13:23:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931AB10658E3 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595AB8FC0A for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.2.65] (c-71-56-39-94.hsd1.ga.comcast.net [71.56.39.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0TDMPgU061357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:22:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Oliver Fromme In-Reply-To: <200901290955.n0T9t2Dx047682@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200901290955.n0T9t2Dx047682@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iQq366k+gJAw8RjT9aVh" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:23:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1233235381.1779.29.camel@wombat.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xorg upgrade and /etc/ttys regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:23:10 -0000 --=-iQq366k+gJAw8RjT9aVh Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:55 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Just to be clear ... Am I understanding things right that > the new X server requires hald and dbus running? It won't > work anymore without them? >=20 > (That would be a good reason for me not to update.) It will work without it. you need to specify Option "AutoAddDevices" "off" in the ServerLayout section of your xorg.conf. You can also disable the HAL option when building the server, but you still need the above I believe. I think it has been fixed in git so that if HAL is not configured that the defaults revert to the old behavior. robert. > Best regards > Oliver --=-iQq366k+gJAw8RjT9aVh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmBrbUACgkQM4TrQ4qfRONMCACdHJLqLGzlvZuWgs9LG6/pjvb+ OwkAniK0YFuC8uY7Rjb3LfZ0wSmZM6rs =dyTB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iQq366k+gJAw8RjT9aVh--