From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 20 14:42:09 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA11040 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:42:09 -0700 Received: from sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu [130.245.1.47]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA11034 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:42:07 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA04493; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 17:41:49 -0400 Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id OAA15746; Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:41:56 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <199504202141.OAA15746@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Minutes of the Thursday, April 13th core team meeting in Berkeley. To: gene@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu (Gene Stark) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 1995 14:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Cc: cs.weber.edu!terry@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu, FreeBSD.org!hackers@sbstark.cs.sunysb.edu In-Reply-To: <199504202110.RAA08175@starkhome.cs.sunysb.edu> from "Gene Stark" at Apr 20, 95 05:10:31 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 590 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > other than the disk slice code". But now 2.1 is going to have devfs and > a bunch of other stuff that darn well looks to me like "major functionality > changes." just a point to note.. devfs is an optional module that is non intrusive and by default is config'd OUT.. it's only there so we can experiment with the idea.. > My feeling is that a system version from approximately April 7 would be > a good one to use as a base for 2.0.5. Check out that release, put it > out for beta test, integrate bug fixes only, and burn it into the CD-ROM. I agree. > > - Gene Stark >