Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:03:37 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: "Justin Robertson" <justin@sk1llz.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Subject: Re: 6.x, 4.x ipfw/dummynet pf/altq - network performance issues Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0702060503j12304748y89ef16cd41ddcbc8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45C7ED9E.1080109@sk1llz.net> References: <45C7A9BD.30403@sk1llz.net> <5pkfs2pfv5sjhiiaegg3bae6casglevhpt@4ax.com> <45C7ED9E.1080109@sk1llz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/02/07, Justin Robertson <justin@sk1llz.net> wrote: > > I've actually already done everything you've suggested with little or no > impact at all. One point where we have different results is with > ADAPTIVE_GIANT, I actually noticed a drop of about 50kpps thruput when > disabling it. > > Hmm I am surprised not more attention has been brought by your observations, I have noticed myself freebsd 4.x holds up much better during ddos then 5.x and 6.x probably due its better robustness and lighter code. I do hope but will probably be dissapointed stability and robustness is on the todo list for the devs in aiming to get 6.x to where 4.x was. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0702060503j12304748y89ef16cd41ddcbc8>