From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 18 00:49:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD931065670; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F7A8FC0C; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcwo16 with SMTP id wo16so4286018obc.13 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:49:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dlgahcJLOJ9ycIb5zg2wZmaXstk6J6My9dLPikeFR9s=; b=wBNCV4gDPkPMjLCXoHXrkpZo+MXxHXBQ3LDqDKDNeI96gCYbzQ/57NjnybJaJkPMBE R2eIEQrR/OEI1F0wmj/rMfsZP8WxmiQZjPBbPrFvOmdHCQ8tZF/wAxuO5Zy4LgN71vxb thNKUE6D621+GyrFepNg6BFAqujU4qoUG2DsI= Received: by 10.50.189.137 with SMTP id gi9mr20256357igc.1.1326847760117; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:49:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (rikad42.riken.jp. [134.160.214.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id lu10sm41572013igc.0.2012.01.17.16.49.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:49:19 -0800 (PST) Sender: Maho NAKATA Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:49:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120118.094916.733931611563135291.maho@FreeBSD.org> To: lists@eitanadler.com From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: References: <20120117092409.GH4729@azathoth.lan> <1326814752.93513.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pfg@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:49:21 -0000 Hi all, Many thanks for discussion. It looks all understands adding "apache" makes sense. However, PKGNAMEPREFIX is defined as ${LANG_PKGNAME}, and PKGNAMESUFFIX is defined as ${LANG_SUFFIX} therefore, English and Japanese version should be something like: en-openoffice-3-devel_US and ja-openoffice-3-devel_JP . Adding apache looks long. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US ja-apache-openoffice-3-devel_JP In my opinion, choosing politically correct one is good. so let's have a ballot; 1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US for me, 2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US thanks From: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:55 -0500 > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Adding the Apache name to the brand is the standard Apache >> policy and in the ports tree we already have more that >> 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache" name. > > devel/subversion ? > java/axis2 ? > > It may make sense to add apache to PKGNAMEPREFIX but please don't move the port. > > > -- > Eitan Adler >