From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 21:55:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246F1106564A for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:55:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01798FC0A for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JZ1001Z20WTODG1@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:55:41 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" In-reply-to: <200804082145.57955.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <47FBE9DD.30703@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <47FBE451.3070202@optonline.net> <200804082145.57955.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) Subject: Re: Why are some linux users saying that FreeBSD is dying X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:55:48 -0000 Pollywog wrote: > On Tuesday 08 April 2008 21:32:01 E. J. Cerejo wrote: >> "FreeBSD is a dying OS because netcraft.com confirms it" that's the >> argument used some of these guys, and I'm wondering what data are they >> using to make their point! Even netcraft is running FreeBSD and the >> uptimes section I can see quite a few running FreeBSD and not one linux! >> Is the data from netcraft reliable? > > I think perhaps the Linux users who say those things are just trying to get > people to use Linux, for political reasons and not because Linux is > necessarily "better". I'm trying to find out what they are looking at in netcraft that can possibly prove their point.