Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:23:53 +0100 From: martinko <martinkov@pobox.sk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What happened with portaudit? Message-ID: <dko63p$66s$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <436E2F88.3010300@t-hosting.hu> <20051106204852.GB25399@ada.devbox.be> <20051106220942.GC904@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2005.11.06 21:48:52 +0100, Jimmy Scott wrote: > >>On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 05:30:00PM +0100, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>> >>>One of my machines I got a report about 3 vulnerable packages (php4, >>>ruby, openssl) in tomorrows security run output, but in today's security >>>run output all of them disappeared, but nobody upgraded or removed the >>>affected packages. I reinstalled portaudit, refreshd its database, but >>>now it reports 0 affected pakages. The pkg_info command lists that three >>>packages, so they are still installed. Does anybody suspect what's wrong? >> >>I noticed the same, but didn't had the time to look for a possible >>answer on that question. > > > It does seem to work for me now. Could people having this problem > please check the size of /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz and try to > run portaudit -Fa to refetch the database and check again? > > For reference: > > [simon@zaphod:/tmp] ls -l /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 31762 6 Nov 22:40 /var/db/portaudit/auditfile.tbz > > There have been one previous report where a problem with the portaudit > database build resulted in an incomplete auditfile which was then > fixed after the next portaudit database rebuild. > it works now. and yes, i did portaudit -Fda several times during that day to no avail. m.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dko63p$66s$1>