From owner-freebsd-security Mon May 28 0:55:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.volant.org (dickson.phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B77A37B422 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patl@Phoenix.Volant.ORG) Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #8) for freebsd-security@freebsd.org id 154HsP-0001aQ-00; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:55:45 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA05914 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT) From: patl@Phoenix.Volant.ORG Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: patl@Phoenix.Volant.ORG Subject: ipfw: reset -vs- unreach port To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There are a few 'nuisance' TCP services that are normally blocked by firewalls (e.g., auth [113] and netbios-ns [137]) In the interest of reducing the delays which would be imposed by simply dropping those packets, is it better to use 'reset' (send an RST), 'unreach port' (send a Port Unreachable ICMP message), or 'unreach filter-prohib' (send a Filter Prohibition ICMP message) ? Or is there another even better option? Thanks, -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message