From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 6 22:58:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E02A16A4CE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:58:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B976643D2D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 71FCAACAEE; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:58:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:58:57 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20050106225857.GB784@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <20050106191201.GA30826@gothmog.gr> <20050106195719.GB24896@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050106195719.GB24896@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: human-readable swap partition sizes with pstat -sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:58:59 -0000 --bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 11:57:19AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: +> I'd argue that we might want to replace the int64_t in humanize_number +> with intmax_t since that wouldn't change the ABI (or API due to implicit +> casts), but would mean we wouldn't have to add a humanize_number128 +> later if some architecture grows 128-bit ints for some reason or +> another. I like intmax_t also much better than int64_t, but I took it from NetBSD and they got int64_t there. Anyway, I think we don't have to be 100% compatible here and I'll look what can be done. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB3cKxForvXbEpPzQRAsgdAJ9Js3Foxl7nUCVmugYA2KRgsQ098ACgusdk lBh7RTUZ+vCJO9eINy5OAmM= =R8mD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bc2iwAtkAaXP8cWF--