Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:27:36 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: stephen@math.missouri.edu Cc: maho@freebsd.org Subject: Re: distfile for lang/ifc Message-ID: <20041217.162736.304102073.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <41B8DCD3.1080009@math.missouri.edu> References: <41B8DCD3.1080009@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <41B8DCD3.1080009@math.missouri.edu> Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> wrote: Dear Stephen How are you doing? > 1. Is it likely that lang/ifc will be updated soon? Yes. updated today. > 2. Or is it possible to get hold of l_fc_pc_8.0.046.tar.gz and > l_fc_pc_8.0.046_pe050.1.tar.gz from somewhere, and if so, will the > non-commercial license that Intel sent me still work on this older version? Go to https://premier.intel.com/ you must be a resgtered user (no fee) > 3. Or if I were to try to update the port myself, would a simple > substitution of distfiles and a few other things in the Makefile do the job? Might be. > I did a search on the mailing list of ports, and I saw some kind of > discussion - maybe lseek doesn't work quite right or something. But my lseek issue was fixed by myself before. > applications will be doing numerical calculations, and so if an lseek > here or there doesn't work quite right, I can live with this. Anyway, > all this discussion seemed to take place in April or May, and I wonder > if people are still thinking about it? So, no :) > P.S. The lang/icc port seems to work great, and for computationally > intensive calculations seems to be faster than the gcc that comes with > FreeBSD 5.3. This is not my port :) but I think netchild is wonderful committer. Thank you very much for your e-mail and suggestion. -- NAKATA, Maho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041217.162736.304102073.chat95>