From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 5 07:49:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6415116A420 for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7F043D5E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 07:49:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB57nVCB057794; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:49:31 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id jB57nU9f057793; Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:49:30 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yar) Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 10:49:30 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy To: "Andrey V. Semyonov" Message-ID: <20051205074930.GB57278@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <4393EDBF.5010609@tcom.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4393EDBF.5010609@tcom.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adding /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the base rcorder X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 07:49:38 -0000 On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:35:27AM +0300, Andrey V. Semyonov wrote: > I apologise for wrong PR-group that a PR was sended to, but it seems to > be very strange that no attantion was made to it at all. And, I continue > to suppose that the PR's way to `rcorder` scripts via localpkg is more > simple (and works fine as I tested) that offered by Doug Barton. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85206 I'm afraid that your approach is considerably less general than Doug's. The problem with your approach is that /usr/local/etc/rc.d scripts can be rcorder'ed only relative to each other and no script from /usr/local/etc/rc.d can be inserted into the main /etc/rc.d sequence at an arbitrary position. With Doug's approach, the latter is possible with the obvious limitation of /usr/local mounted already. I think that the problem you reported has been solved in CURRENT and the PR state may be changed at least to "patched." -- Yar