From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 25 10:12:03 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC2C106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk
	[IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A558FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2BE72B2;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from
	:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=uyNo5vN0O2jS
	BIgYCFl6zZxmjHM=; b=UOJH/UadEzPmoYAxebwwhpZUZH7XuKimhT2cxZ4rNMrs
	ffpBohW6yyyX5cVMoQ8OdOIYyXn8/yu0FqOQhJRl+PDXemZLeEKvdBywA/ohrek5
	IDZ35E+qexZzIB9Q0vVpyliQWdtxdymmURM26fBYYdxI4qkomgK7A/aEIRdf86Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to
	:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=NGJysY
	A3ElK5E9bl5dc9hke7XtgWKA2lEJ2glBcjo1AcSX8ysdollgujtrVQaJ0Hpq2L6d
	plaf/6OY8F+TOK7U5EWuLFEQzi00f4FvG9txDq8quyVAeQt5Lw/X419X58lxBs0/
	Xk/8hZS3fQnu+LDQ76NWQlew4DYmPDnoF55+k=
Received: from unknown (client-86-27-40-45.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com
	[86.27.40.45])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30936E72B1;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:01 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:11:56 +0000
From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>
To: Xn Nooby <xnooby@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20101225101156.00001458@unknown>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwJ1qQvEhDh3cX8N-_ur3+qODZhWemyVu-ujo6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikwJ1qQvEhDh3cX8N-_ur3+qODZhWemyVu-ujo6@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD utilize VT/HVM ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 -0000

On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:56:14 -0500
Xn Nooby <xnooby@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a new computer that has VT (Virtualization Technology), so I am
> able to virtualize other OS's when running Linux and their KVM.  Does
> FreeBSD have a method of using VT to virtualize other OS's?  Jails are
> really cool, especially since they do not need VT - but I was
> wondering if there was an advantage to having VT when running FreeBSD.
> 
> Or would the VT be more-or -less unused with FreeBSD?

emulators/virtualbox-ose can make use of it.

-- 
Bruce Cran