From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 11 01:01:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA03356
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 01:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA03348
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 01:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.8.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id IAA06235; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 08:00:42 GMT
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 17:00:42 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 430TX ?
In-Reply-To: <199704102254.PAA05935@freefall.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970411165742.6102A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Darren Reed wrote:

> In some mail from Terry Lambert, sie said:
> > 
> > > Is the 430TX chipset recognised/supported yet ?
> > 
> > Is this a PCI chipset?
> 
> Yes, the "latest" from Intel (advertised as faster than HX and VX).

While we're talking about Intel, they claim that they're focusing more on
memory bandwidth these days and the Pentium II has some kind of dual bus
architecture that makes a significant performance difference.

Regards,


Mike Hancock